ARTICLES & BOOKS   Jeremy Driscoll OSB
A Monk’s Alphabet

Moments of Stillness in a Turning World

DARTON - LONGMAN + TODD, 2006

For Paul Murray, OP who helped so much with this alphabet and who helps so much in general

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Teaching
Tears
Telephone
Tentative
Testaccio
Thread
Three
Time
Time 2
Traces
Transience
Tremendous

Teaching

In a conversation with Elliot on how he teaches Scripture to college kids, he said something that can be a concrete guide for my own teaching. If he speaks of the structure of the text, philology, etc., no one listens. But if he says, "You love her, don't you? Here's what that means ..." then they pay attention. I must find the "You love her" in the other's life and from there begin to unfold the riches of Christian faith.

Tears

My heart is breaking that all things are passing away. This brutal fact punctures my whole inner being, and my life leaks out in the form of tears. All that I love - beautiful earth, lovely people - all fade away and are gone. And our fading is accompanied by absurd sins expressing our desperation. For these too, especially for mine, I have tears. Yet in this anguish a hope is hidden. I find it in the Book of Revelation, in the words, "He will wipe away every tear from their eyes, and death shall be no more, neither shall there by mourning nor crying nor pain any more, for the former things have passed away." (Rev. 21:4) The "former" things are still too much present in me, and their passing away is what is breaking my heart. But I am writing toward my future and placing these words on the page as my own hope, as that in which I trust: every tear wiped away and death no more.

Telephone

Aren't virtually all of my meetings with others arranged in advance by phone? Or weren't they once? (Now more and more happens by e-mail.) This may not be especially significant, but perhaps it is worth noticing. I am struck by how in London - in old novels such as those by Charles Dickens or Sir Arthur Conan Doyle - people would send letters arranging for a meeting. Very brief, like our e-mails, but more formal and polite. Without such means as this, it would be quite difficult to keep up contact. I think I would see much less of others. So I am grateful for these things.

Tentative

I want to say something, write something, and to say and write it well. But why? And to whom? What exactly do I want to say? If I am silent till I know, I may never speak. Such silence is to be preferred to gibberish or aimless wandering, but it risks becoming deadening. There must be a way of being tentative that could be beautiful, helpful, that could move us closer to some greater grasp of things. So here is a goal for words proffered: humble speech in which the silence from which the speaker emerges and soon returns is also heard as a living, life-giving space. Silence as life, as the search, and not merely as not knowing.

Testaccio

"Zia" is the Italian word for "aunt." If I were Italian and had an aunt named Helen, she would be my Zia Elena. Instead the Zia Elena in my life is not a relation but a bar with this name in the part of Rome known as Testaccio, a unique and lively neighborhood. (In Italy the word "bar" is used to designate those places that can be found about every twenty paces, where in the morning you can have a coffee and a quick bite to eat, in the afternoon an ice cream or a beer.) During a number of years Zia Elena was my foot in the door of Testaccio, for it is only about 40 paces away from the back door of my Roman monastery. I often stopped in there for a cappuccino during morning study breaks as I took a brisk walk through the neighborhood. I soon became known to the owners and to the regular customers, and they were only too happy to have a monk and a priest with whom they could exchange their observations about God and the Church and the meaning of life and the different ways coffee should be prepared and why it's not fair the way they are ticketing parked cars nowadays. Sometimes I would talk with my theology students about these conversations in the bar, telling them that the insights which emerge from the refined language and paradigms of academic disquisition must still be connected with the more simply expressed concerns of the people I met at Zia Elena. I called this "Theology in Testaccio," and that became a shorthand expression in my lectures to signal that we were going to move from the level of lofty thoughts to an exposure of their existential relevance.
One scene can serve as an example of how intense theology in Testaccio could actually become. I was standing on a particular morning in a very crowded Zia Elena and was working my way over to the cash register to pay. One of my closest friends in the bar was Stefania, who collected the money, counted change back, and carried on several other conversations all at once. When she saw me that day, even while returning money to someone else, she said excitedly, "O Je! [short and friendly Roman version of my name, Jeremy] I wanted to ask you something. Yesterday I was praying the Our Father," she explained, "and I suddenly realized that I wasn't able to say the words 'forgive us as we forgive' because there's lots of people that I don't forgive and don't want to. What should I do?" she bluntly asked. The next thing I heard was someone else say, "Two coffees and two sandwiches," wanting to know how much they owed. Stefania answered, and while she took their money, I said, "Listen. This is important." I discovered in Testaccio that unless you begin your sentence in a vivid or dramatic way, you can fade out in the crush of traffic, or Stefania might easily forget what she had asked. I continued, "When Jesus was dying on the cross, he prayed for those who were putting him to death saying, 'Father, forgive them for they know not what they do.' That was perfect forgiveness," I explained. Then, not wanting to lose this first strand of my answer, I hurried ahead saying, "Jesus is praying in you when you pray the Our Father. So let his perfect forgiveness be in you. Say the prayer with him praying in you and you will learn to forgive. If you wait until you've already forgiven enough, you'll never pray it. But if you let Jesus pray it in you, you will learn from him to forgive."
There was a pause - unusual for her. She dropped her various strands of conversation and stopped her shifting of the money. She shouted out over people's heads to her son at the bar who was making cappuccinos and said with wonder, "Armando, Jeremy just explained the Our Father to me and I understood it!" The crowd went silent, and I could see that everyone was wondering what had been said. In the little interval Armando announced generously, "Of course you understood once Je explained it." Then after that, the noise picked up again. People were still wondering what exactly I had said and so I repeated my short lesson, now to this group, now to that. That's generally how theology in Testaccio comes about. Lessons short but intense, and life going on all around us.

Thread

I have this image while I pray: what God has done in Jesus hanging as a thin thread from top to bottom of the whole universe. It appears frail and dimensionless, without color, and virtually invisible. Still, it is there, even if surrounded all around by the vast space of earth, by the endless space of the regions beyond. I reach out and touch this thread. That's all there is to do with it. It's not a rope you can grab on to and climb upward with. You can only touch it, feel it against your hand. But surprisingly, something comes from this. I touch it, move it a little, and some new something comes into me, some new life, a new seeing. I don't climb up on it. I don't follow it down. I don't go anywhere. But when I touch it, I feel a great connection.
I am touching it now. I am feeling against my hand something which by comparison with the substantial things all around me hardly exists. And yet a power comes out from this touch. It is as if - virtually
unnoticed, no more than the slight movement of a thread - the door to an entirely new dimension cracks open and I find myself standing within it. I don't know how. I am in the same place. I see all the same things around me. I am still me and I must face the day. But a bit of understanding begins to emerge and some sense to it all. As improbable as it seems, I dare to think I may now be connected with God, even in a kind of intimacy. How exactly, I can't say. I can only bear witness to this marvelous surprise. When I touch this thread, I feel a great connection. Then the connection fades. So I reach out and touch it again. Again I am connected.

Three

Around three concepts, I want to try to summarize a lot. Creation ex nihilo: from a nothing with no qualities whatsoever, God creates the universe. Before, there is only God; after, there is God and all that he created. Sin: a path toward a different nothingness, a nothingness with the quality of a rupture of relationship, a break with truth, moral culpability. Redemption: the eternal God descends to the bottommost part of this sinful nothingness and from that nothing, ex nihilo, recreates the world: new heavens and a new earth and a new human being.

Time

Before time was, there was no time. Obvious enough - logically. But there was God in his complete eternity, which already included time as something that God imagined. This is not something that at some point started to be within God because God doesn't have starts within himself.
In this sense, then, time has been from all eternity, and all that has happened in time has always been there. Even so, God actually starts it all one day, and it becomes something other than God, something other than eternity. Magnificent! Wondrously imaginative! And yet what has unfolded in this way from God is all destined to likewise infold back into him "so that God may be all in all."

Time 2

Its nature, its effects, its tone, the emotions it awakens. Time is the biggest question for art, for philosophy, for religion.

Traces

During the morning prayer today, while I was chanting the psalms, a huge desire unexpectedly passed through me that seemed not to originate from within me but from ... the Holy Spirit perhaps? It was something to the effect of really desiring to disappear into God and of leaving no trace here. Traces are hard enough to leave in any case, but something in most of us, whether we are aware of it or not, spends a fair amount of energy trying strongly to affect the course of things, to leave traces. Fair enough. We are made like this, and it is such a constitution that makes the world go round. But what I felt this morning was a pure desire for something c1early beyond this world, for something that relativized the world and my life in it. What was striking is that the desire seemed to arise, as I say, not from within me but from beyond me. As I watched it for a while, I realize that this origin beyond me gave me good reason to hope that what I desired might possibly be had; for the One who awakened it in me was the One in whom I hope to disappear.
Unfortunately this did not last very long, and I only have an elusive sense of all that I am speaking about.

Transience

More than once I've noted Czeslaw Milosz citing Edgar Allan Poe as saying that the melancholy of transience is the most poetic of tonalities. Yes, of course. But the dreadful pain of this thought must be faced and grappled with. And I am wondering if it is possible to conceive of salvation as grappling with precisely that? And if it doesn't, then what salvation is it? Great or small, we all pass away and are no more, and all things pass away. What real difference does it make if some are remembered with love for a while and others are discussed for a period for the merit of their thoughts or deeds? Undoubtedly it is right to remember and discuss. Indeed, it would be absurd for us, the living, not to do so since any given moment of being alive is stitched together from a combination of people and events unfolding and people and events remembered. My point is simply the absolute poignancy of it all eventually passing away. And though much of what passes is shallow and of little significance, there is also a huge amount of untold greatness and stunning, unique beauty.
So if we are saved in Christ, we must be saved somehow from this apparent passing, this apparent vanishing into nothingness. But how? Where? Naturally, I cannot offer any clear answer. Yet I sense the possibility of such a saving being contacted and "fore-tasted" in the act of prayer as invocation. I call out various versions of "O God, Lord of the Universe," and I am met, it seems, by a force, a power, that is going to save me, that is going to save us all. Even so, in whatever way such saving might come about, one thing is clear: the passing away is utterly real and it sweeps away sooner or later absolutely everyone and every thing. This must be faced and grappled with. But I find it virtually unbearable.

Tremendous

There are such things as exercises for feeling my soul. I can practice and do things and live in such a way that I will feel my soul more and more, and thereby it would grow healthier, stronger, more glad. The strongest exercise is loving and letting myself be loved. What happens in this experience is a strengthening of the I, the sheer strong subject that I am calling here my I. When I love another, I am exercising myself as a free, choosing subject who, given a real choice to love or not to love, has chosen to love. In doing this I awaken to the tremendous force concealed in me. I feel and am using a power that is clearly stronger than death. In letting myself be loved by another, I feel this force coming toward me.
Another desires me, and in knowing me, desires me to live for ever.
It will sound like a cliché to say it, but it is still true: love between God and the soul is the strongest and most complete instance of the exercise of love which awakens the soul.